Marketers: Show Me Something Unexpected by Creating Your Own Images

Katie Burkhart is the founder of KBurkhart & Co. and serves as the lead brand strategist and designer. You can follow Katie on Twitter @KBurkhartCo, read her posts on Medium, and subscribe to her newsletter to have content sent right to your inbox.

I have two stories to tell you.

First, I’m browsing through the Wall Street Journal magazine, in print, on a Saturday morning. I flip past pages of ads and even content, eyes skimming the surface but not digging in.

Then I stopped. There was an ad for what I believed to be a jacket. It was so simple, the jacket hanging on a specific type of hook, the lighting executed to focus my attention on that hook, which in juxtaposition feels out of place and yet entirely perfect.

Image Source: Wall Street Journal Magazine

Image Source: Wall Street Journal Magazine

Second, I went shopping for a new smartphone, an exercise in comparing features I will likely never use to determine how to spend a lot of money for something I do not personally find fascinating. But one trend stuck out: the biggest selling point right now is the camera.

It doesn't matter if you're loyal to Apple or went on an adventure and tried the Google Pixel; everyone touts their camera as the feature show.

What do these stories have in common? They made me wonder why, if we all have these phenomenal little machines in our pockets, I scroll past most images because I've seen them before. They're one of the same dozen or so stock photos we're all passing around, despite having the ability to produce something different.

And as content creators, our collective acceptance of this reality means that our audiences are scrolling right past our content, too.

Create the Unexpected

Let me start by saying I’m guilty of using some of the dirty dozen. Because stock photos have become so readily available and are often free, I lean on the crutch. It’s understandable. If you’re writing a lot of posts, you need a lot of corresponding images -- and you need them quick. That says nothing about keeping social channels populated, or websites, or printed collateral. It can be a daunting task, and searchable libraries of well composed, high-resolution content provide a comfortable solution.

But, as my grandma says, nothing in life is free. “There’s a myriad of ways to hold your business back from success, and one of the most common and easily-fixable mistakes is the visual engagement pass over,” says Chris Newhard, videographer and storyteller. I reached out to hear his perspective as a purely visual content creator and one of my favorite collaborators. He continued, saying “Businesses have a duty to engage their current and potential clients on a deeper, more connected level with original content.”

I couldn't agree more. The reason I stopped on the ad with the hook and jacket was because it presented something to me in a way that was different than the rest of the magazine, and yet felt entirely specific and intentional to that brand. It told me a story with detail, not a pass over of what I've seen a hundred times.

It’s time we step up and commit to creating photos that tell our stories in clear, unexpected ways, most of which starts in the details, in creating images that are as intentional as the rest of our brand identities, and as precise as the wording we choose for our headlines. In short, something our audiences will want to look at because it offers them something they didn’t expect out of habit.

Unexpected Comes from Different Methods

When trying to come up with photos that are -- dare I say it -- unique to your brand, there are several approaches you can take. The option closest to a nicotine patch for free stock photos would be to investigate premium photo collections that restrict the number of licenses they sell. Utilizing these collections will help decrease the number of places you see “your photo,” and will still have the benefits of seamless discovery.

Another approach is to hire a photographer to take photos that go with specific campaigns, or even work with a few photographers to curate your own internal library so content teams and others have ample selection. This approach will likely take time to build up, but offers the greatest opportunity to make specific decisions that deliver unexpected results.

If you can’t afford a photographer, you can do it yourself. Smartphones now have the ability to shoot in beautiful, blurred background portrait mode and the Google Pixel 2 boasts stunning AI that uses an algorithm to combine multiple shots into one clear, crisp image. Our phones have made photography highly accessible, so encourage your team to give it a shot (pun intended) on behalf of your brand.

An alternative approach would be to use photos generated by your users or audience. Maybe you’re a brand with a following that has a particular flair for creativity-packed Instagram accounts. Consider giving them a way to share their photos with you so you can use them in your campaigns or other content. Just remember to get their permission first.

Even if you can't break the habit of using free stock photos, take a minute and think about how you can edit that image we’ve all seen before. An alternative cropping, selective color or an overlay does help to catch the eye during an otherwise boring scroll through the digital list.

Regardless of which method you choose, you should always ask yourself “Does this image tell a specific story that supports my brand?”

Asking this question will lead to photos that provide an unexpected experience for your audience because your choices will be intentional rather than general.

Most importantly, you should remember that your biggest opportunity lies in showing something genuine. Don’t just show me a desk: Show me your desk, with all the little things that make it human.

“These simple yet effective investments instantly connect your audience on a more personal level — and tell them that your business is full of what matters most: people,” Chris said as he closed out his email. “As you continue to develop your own content, you’re building trust with [your audience] and proving that you care about what you’re doing.”

Take out your phones, content creators, and start purposefully capturing the world so I can engage in a scroll-stopping, click-on-your-content-for-more, kind of way because you delivered something I wasn’t expecting to see.

(And yes, the images in this post were originally created.)

A Content Marketer's Guide to Decoding Dev Jargon

Brendan Butts is Senior Technical Lead at Alipes Inc.

Developers often use technical jargon in conversation, forgetting that not everyone has a full understanding of what those words actually mean. This can lead to confusion, especially because when asked to explain what something is, they use even more hard-to-understand jargon. Below, we go over some common technical words and phrases that get thrown around a lot.

Agile Development

This is a software development methodology -- a process used for developing software -- that is very popular with modern-day technologists. Agile itself is not limited to development and can be applied to many business areas, including marketing. It involves small, cross-functional teams, which operate in sprints.

Sprint

A sprint is a timeboxed set of work, the length of which is decided by the agile team. Typically a sprint is a week, two weeks, or a month, though sprints can be shorter.

Backlog

This is the work that remains to be done on a project. It is typically in a project management system and is often ordered by priority. When a sprint is completed, the top items from the backlog typically become the contents of the next sprint.

User Story

A user story is a technique used in Agile to capture some work that needs to be done, from the end-user perspective. For example, “As a visitor to the website, I want to be able to go to the contact page and fill out a form to submit my information to the sales team in order to facilitate a conversation about starting to use the product.”

Waterfall

Waterfall is the old-school style of developing software. You work on a project for an entire year, going from version 2.0 to version 3.0 and finally at the end of the year, you release to software. It’s called this because, unlike agile in which you develop in short bursts and release often, the development process is like a river you travel down for a long time, and the release process is the waterfall, in which everything is released at once.

Scrum & Standup

Scrum is a type of agile development. It is also the name many use for the daily team meeting where each team member tells the group what they did the day before, what they are working on today and what their blockers are. These meetings are done while standing, to keep them brief, and are often referred to as stand-ups.

Blockers

A blocker is simply something that is blocking you from accomplishing a task.

Jira

Jira is a project management product by Atlassian. It is commonly used by development teams to track their sprints, backlog, and to assign work to individuals.

MVP

Minimum Viable Product. In development parlance, this is a piece of software or a website that has the minimum amount of features for it to be useful for early adopters.

AWS

Amazon Web Services. Amazon doesn’t just sell stuff online. It also provides one of the largest and most used cloud services in the world. Without getting into the gritty details, many websites are hosted on AWS and even more assets --images, PDFs, etc. -- are hosted on AWS S3.

CDN

A Content Delivery Network is a geographically distributed network of servers that can be employed to serve up static content like images and files. It is useful because these are very fault tolerant in that if one server goes down, other servers can pick up their slack.

S3

Simple Storage Service is a CDN provided by AWS. Many websites and applications use S3 for storage. When you upload an image to Slack, it is stored in S3. When you upload an image to many websites, S3 is where the image is stored.

Hopefully this has given you a bit more to go on when you’re engaging developers in conversation. You might even find yourself surprising the developers if you start throwing around phrases like “What kind of blockers are we seeing on user stories this sprint?”

What to Consider When Seeking Feedback on Your Writing

Boston-based Chuck Leddy has been crafting engaging content since 1995, as a journalist and B2B brand storyteller. He's written for B2B brands such as General Electric, ADP, Office Depot, Cintas, the National Center for the Middle Market, and many more. He's also been published in print publications such as the Boston Globe, Forbes, the Washington Post, and San Francisco Chronicle. His website and blog are at www.ChuckLeddy.com.

I was asked recently to be a guest lecturer for a college writing class. The instructor asked me to share some insights about writing (I’m a brand storyteller) with her students, who were filled with energy and lots of thoughtful questions about writing. One student asked me if there was a "right" way to use feedback. The question got me thinking about that, and other, questions related to feedback. Let me answer five basic feedback-related questions here:

1. Is it always a good idea to seek feedback on your writing? The answer depends. You may be working against a tight deadline and hence have limited time to seek feedback. In these cases, I don't recommend you seek it. At other times, you may feel confident about what you're doing (perhaps due to experience) and won't necessarily feel the need to invite feedback. I generally seek feedback when there's time for it and when I feel feedback will improve my writing (in other words, when I have some doubts about what I’m doing). Usually these doubts revolve around beginnings and endings, and the overall narrative flow and tone/voice of the writing.

2. Who should you approach for feedback? It's a good idea to have two or three people you trust who are willing to provide feedback. I have a close friend who is an experienced, savvy business consultant. When I'm writing about business topics and I have time and doubts, I'll email him my draft and ask him to provide feedback. I also ask my wife for feedback. She's a skilled editor (and English teacher) and has always been able to spot weaknesses in my writing, which has been tremendously helpful. Find smart people you trust to offer feedback, and reward them for providing it (with at least a “thank you” note).

3. What feedback is “valuable”/useful? Well, it depends on what you need. I like to have feedback that spots problems in the writing, but I generally don't want the person to offer specific solutions. In my opinion, it's the writer's job to find solutions once the problems have been identified. With my wife, for example, I always ask her beforehand to point out problems but not tell me how to solve them.

On a related note, useful feedback is always about the specifics of the writing itself and never about the writer. To be useful, feedback should be as specific as possible. "Your ending doesn't feel right," for instance, isn't very useful. It recognizes a problem, but the writer wants to understand the problem in more detail. Better feedback might be: "The ending doesn't seem to tie together with the rest of what you've written, so it seems tacked on at the end because you ran out of space or couldn’t think of something more organic." With this latter feedback, I can analyze and solve the problem. All good writers must be strong problem-solvers once specific problems present themselves through feedback.

4. What if the feedback is more about the person giving feedback than the writer or the writing? Then it’s bad feedback the writer can feel free to disregard. Sometimes, the giver of feedback would handle the writing differently, perhaps using a different tone of voice or structure. That's fine, but the writer is the owner of the work and the writing should reflect the writer's perspective. Take in all feedback, yes, but the writer retains the ultimate right to disregard it. If, for example, you write a personal essay about a painful childhood experience, nobody has the right to tell you not to share that story or to make it more upbeat. These choices are the writer’s alone.

5. Do the same feedback rules apply to editors? Yes, but editors should be able to both identify problems and also help you resolve them with precise, actionable suggestions. Editors are supposed to understand the "editorial voice" of the publication or client, so if a writer is off target with the voice/tone, a good editor will help you get back on target. Like a good writer, a good editor is also a problem-solver. Editors who merely point out problems (“The tone doesn't feel quite right. Can you change it?") are not effective editors, and writers won't much enjoy writing for them. When you find an editor adept at providing good feedback, keep working with that editor.

The best practice would be to start asking for more feedback and learning how to use it as you go. That will take time and patience, but will also improve the way you work and the writing output itself. For this reason, and in the right context, good feedback is a gift you should seek out and use wisely.

Telling Stories in the Post-Text World

Ed Harrison is the SVP, B2B Tech Practice Lead at InkHouse.

A version of this post initially appeared on the InkHouse blog.

Are you ready for the post-text future?

(I acknowledge the irony of using the written word to comment on its de-emphasis.)

Earlier this year, the New York Times’ Farhad Manjoo headlined a collective of reporters cataloging the trends shaping the digital world.

The takeaway? While words still matter, video, images and audio have taken the lion’s share of our attention from text-based content — attention spans that were already lagging behind that of a goldfish.

From the longform journalism of the New York Times’ podcast The Daily to Google’s ambitious Accelerated Mobile Pages format for publishers, major media players are embracing new ways to create, publish and distribute their content. Our increasingly digitized lifestyle also presents new opportunities for marketers and PR pros to rethink the way we tell stories using fewer words, and more, rich content, such as:

Less Is More

We all know the media landscape is changing (again). My colleague Tina Cassidy recently shared her conversation with a senior editor at a major news outlet. No one is reading the glut of news, and publishers are favoring “fewer stories, but more impactful ones.” PR is staying apace, so the time has come to shed our “more is better approach” and, instead, focus on generating fewer, better stories targeted at key audiences, measured with real data.

As communicators, the post-text world simultaneously changes everything — and nothing. The assets may be more visual, but the foundation — a strong story, grounded in authenticity and extended with a unique point of view — remains critical.